Subject: Re: fsnsc and fsntc
From: Charlie Zender (zender@uci.edu)
Date: Wed Aug 29 2001 - 14:54:31 MDT
Yes, this is correct because the diagnostic clear sky computation is
performed with only two layers, whereas the full sky uses all plev(p)
layers.
Charlie
Bala Govindasamy wrote:
> Hello users of CCM3:
>
> In the subroutine, radcsw, that does SW calcualtions, fsnt, fsns, fsntc
> and fsnsc are calculated as follows
>
> fsnt(i) = fsnt(i) + solflx(i)*(fluxdn(i,1) - fluxup(i,1))
> fsns(i) = fsns(i) + solflx(i)*
> $ (fluxdn(i,plevp) - fluxup(i,plevp))
>
> fsntc(i) = fsntc(i) + solflx(i)*(fluxdn(i,0)-fluxup(i,0))
> fsnsc(i) = fsnsc(i) + solflx(i)*(fluxdn(i,2)-fluxup(i,2))
>
> The level indexes differ for all sky and clear sky computations.
> Is this right?
>
>
> --
> Bala
> ----------------------------------------
> Dr. Bala Govindasamy
> Physicist
> L-103, Atmospheric Science Division
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> Livermore
> CA 94550
> Ph.: 925 423 0771
> Fax: 925 422 6388
> Email: bala@LLNL.GOV; bala_indu@yahoo.com
> http://en-env.llnl.gov/cccm/balacv.html
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
>
> .
>
>
-- Charlie Zender zender@uci.edu (949) 824-2987/FAX-3256, Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine CA 92697-3100 Visiting NCAR CGD Jul 1-Aug 31: Room ML-304A (303) 497-1738/FAX-1324 Work Address: NCAR CGD, 1850 Table Mesa Dr., Boulder, CO, 80303-5602 Home Address: 1135 Albion Way, Boulder CO, 80303, (303) 499-1570
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Tue Jan 22 2002 - 11:16:04 MST