From: bhatt@meeker.ucar.edu (Uma Bhatt)
Message-Id: <199406242236.QAA21266@meeker.ucar.EDU>
Subject: estabv.mod question
To: ccm-users@ncar.ucar.edu (ccm users group)
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 94 16:36:10 MDT
Hi ccm users,
I had run about 15 years of a ccm1 run (coupled to a mixed-layer ocean)
when I read about the estabv compiler problem.
I submitted a short test run that called the mod called /ccm/ccm1/r15/estabv.
mods. The first time I ran it I just copied estabv.mods into my ocean mods.
The output for the ocean ocean model for 150 days was exactly the same as
in my original run (where estabv is not called). I also did a test run where
I incorporated the estabv.mods through a nupdate call (-i option). This
test run was also exactly the same as my original run. I am wondering if I
am incorporating the mods correctly since I would expect some changes in
latent heat flux (since this does need saturation specific humidity at Ts)
and therefore changes in ocean temperature.
Any suggestions? Have people found this to be an intermittant problem? I
need to evaluate if it is necessary for me to rerun the first 15 years. I
do not have any previous runs and the controls I have used were run before
the problem started.
thanks in advance,
Uma Bhatt
bhatt@imzadi.meteor.wisc.edu